Protection & Indemnity

UK P&I CLUB | www.ukpandi.com

2016/17 financial year results

  • Premiums reduced by 2.4% (NB the 2016/17 financial year included a -3% premium rebate, equating to just under USD 10m)
  • Net paid and net incurred claims increased by 4.6% and 13.4% respectively
  • Despite a USD 22.1 million underwriting deficit, an above average investment return of 4.6% resulted in an overall surplus of USD 10.5 million

Combined Ratio

The UK Club’s accounts treat foreign exchange differently to most of the other clubs. The most common approach is to report the foreign exchange movement on outstanding claims within the claims cost heading, and the exchange movement relating to investments within the investment return. The UK Club’s approach is to include all foreign exchange movements (claims and investment related) under foreign exchange. This accounting difference makes the UK Club’s investment return appear higher, and the underwriting result worse, than if reported like their peers.

In 2016/17, if the UK Club had reported in a similar way to the majority of the market, then the club’s investment return would have been 3.4% rather than the reported 4.6%.

By contrast the combined ratio would have been 103.4% if the UK reported like most of the market, compared to the 107% combined ratio actually reported.

The combined ratio comparison is further complicated because the UK P&I Club rebated 3% of the mutual premium in 2016/17. The combined ratio based on originally estimated mutual premium would have been: 104% (vs 107%). If the same currency adjustment were made, this underlying combined ratio would improve further, to 100.4%.

Consolidated Financial Year Summary (USD 000s)

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Income and Expenditure
Calls and Premiums 408,059 385,360 376,170
Reinsurance Premiums -88,969 -81,414 -81,082
Operating Expenses -43,961 -44,874 -43,595
Operating Income 275,129 259,072 251,493
Gross Paid Claims 349,693 299,461 280,284
Net Paid Claims 313,480 241,989 253,028
Net Change in Provision for Claims -23,544 -737 20,591
Net Incurred Claims 289,936 241,252 273,619
Technical Surplus (Deficit) -14,807 17,820 -22,126
Investment Income 33,872 -19,045 32,659
Overall Surplus for Year (Deficit) 19,065 -1,225 10,533
       
Balance sheet
Net Assets 1,262,845 1,248,255 1,268,556
Net Outstanding Claims 715,079 701,342 710,739
Free Reserves 547,766 546,913 557,817
       
Hybrid Capital 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
The above figures include the contribution of the UK P&I Club"s perpetual subordinated capital (hybrid capital). The amounts included relating to this perpetual subordinated capital are as follows:
Interest on Hybrid Capital (in investment income) 7,500 7,500 7,500
Assets of Hybrid Capital 98,697 99,069 99,440
Entered tonnage (GT, millions) 2015 2016 2017
Owned / Mutual 127 135 139
Chartered / Fixed 98 98 100
Total 225 233 239
       
S&P Rating History 2015 2016 2017
  A A A
       
Average Expense Ratio (AER) 2015 2016 2017
Five years ending 20 February 9.66 10.28 10.22

Combined Ratio

Combined ratios provide a direct comparison of club underwriting performance. The combined ratio is essentially the net loss ratio for the club and is defined as follows:

Combined ratio =

(Net incurred claims + operating expenses)
(Premium – reinsurance costs)

  • A combined ratio of 100% represents an underwriting break-even position
  • Anything in excess of 100% would be an underwriting loss
  • A combined ratio less than 100% would represent an underwriting surplus.

Average Expense Ratio (AER)

Average Expense Ratios (AERs) were introduced in 1999 following pressure from the European Commission in an attempt to enable direct comparisons of operating costs between clubs within the International Group. The formula that all clubs are required to adhere to when calculating their AER figure is as follows:

The AER formula is the
five-year average of:

(Operating expenses x 100)
(Premium income + Investment income)

In principle the AER is a reasonable idea, but in reality it is only ever a very approximate guide to the relative operating costs of individual clubs. For example different membership profiles, disproportionately high levels of premium or investment, whether the club owns or rents their office space, how much the club spends on loss prevention, global office network, member portals etc all have an impact on the AER.